🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and families are monitoring with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

Across Europe, a rising group of nations are exploring comparable bans.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that phones and networks are "taking away our kids' childhood". Legislation could be enacted soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the user details of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban is "an options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked the legislature to approve a bill increasing the legal age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a similar step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The administration in the Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their children from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has passed a advisory statement demanding a ban for minors without parental consent is provided. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" design of these services, the step does not establish binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a good starting point," said a leading European lawmaker behind the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "based on strong data".

Earlier, interest grew behind a bill to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually weakened. However, the government pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced warnings. One foundation set up by the family of a teenager who died after being exposed to disturbing platform posts contends that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "cliff edge" of risk when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to build products and services that are appropriate and suitable for minors," commented a leading child protection advocate.

America: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, legislation is primarily happening at the regional government level against a backdrop of country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has signed a law prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra use needing adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced laws demanding adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and proposals from various figures to mimic Australia's example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Global Views

Outside of Europe and the US, additional countries are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government intends to prohibit social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

However, world organizations strike a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The body notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

Even as this international debate unfolds, the steps of Australia and its followers demonstrate that governments globally are no longer prepared to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.