🔗 Share this article

Iran is willing to restart atomic talks with the United States on condition that it is treated with "respect" and "honor", Iran's foreign minister has declared.

The Iranian diplomat declared exclusively dialogue was effective, and disclosed fresh requests had originated from go-betweens to resume talks with the US government. He asserted Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to access bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Navigating a Challenging Path

Araghchi is treading a complex path since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be operating from a situation of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged stronger defensively and emotionally from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Negotiations Suddenly Ended

The prior phases of discussions between the United States and Iran were ended suddenly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that concluded with Donald Trump declaring the facilities had been destroyed. Following this, European countries used their authority to restore global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Offered

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in previous talks, when it was settled an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Both sides would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Diplomats claimed repeatedly they had reached agreement with Washington's diplomat Steve Witkoff only for the arrangement to fall apart due to "spoilers in Washington".

Existing Position

Tehran representatives declared the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be revived in some form if discussions resume.

The American leader last week stated he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to resume discussions, but privately Iranian officials claim they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from the United States either explicitly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been accused of inactivity in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his remarks to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that exploits the idea of international law, Araghchi said the 12-day war showed the dispute could not be settled by armed force. He stated the strikes started with a American requirement for an unconditional Iranian surrender and culminated with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the first strikes by Israel were executed with total Washington understanding and coordination, making trust difficult to rebuild.

Diplomacy Continues the Ultimate Resolution

The foreign minister stated: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had consistently attempted to impose their will during the negotiations. Negotiations can still be alive and remains the final resolution to resolve disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and fundamentals must be respected."

"Provided that they address to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of respect and respect, they will obtain a response in the same approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is characterized by Iranian officials as the battle of repair and recovery, the foreign minister said he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "have significantly improved than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned multiple understandings from this engagement; we have come to know our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our nuclear technology, which they planned to obliterate, remains in place. The sites and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is essential is the determination of the nation of Iran and then the unity of the country that they targeted, but failed to shatter. The Iranian people have developed more resilient, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the leadership and the nation in the wake of this invasion."